Re: [CANSLIM] Introduction: John F. Nogueira, Jr.

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Introduction: John F. Nogueira, Jr.
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 21:07:35 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Stop Loss Dbphoenix@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Stop Loss "Bill S."
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Introduction: John F. Nogueira, Jr. Tim Fisher
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

The only CS item that I noted as less than good/excellent is the
timeliness, and this is only a minor factor to me. The other items
that are less than desirable (larger float, high debt) do not
disqualify it against the excellent standing in the group, the
chart, the RS, EPS, earnings and revenue growth, etc.

Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my
employer. My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation
of any kind. I am a licensed (inactive) broker and an active
investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any
investment, especially one learned about on the Internet. Hopefully
my comments will better inform and educate all investors.

tom w

- ----------
> From: Tim Fisher <tfish@spiritone.com>
> To: canslim@mail.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Introduction: John F. Nogueira, Jr.
> Date: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 10:52 AM
> 
> At 07:50 AM 9/10/97 -0400, you wrote:
> 
> >I was not familiar with GECM (Genicom), thanks for pointing it
out.
> >Just went and took a look at it at DG Online and does look
> >attractive. It's nr 1 in its group (Computer peripheral equip)
with
> >good CS nrs. Growth has been steady, as has the price move from
the
> >$6 base now up to 14. The only neg I saw was timeliness of C and
> >the large float compared to the issued (over 9 mil to 10 mil).
On
> >small float stocks I prefer to see management having a vested
> >interest in equity and look for no more than a 50 to 75% float
max.
> >Without knowing the history of this co, it's possible that they
did
> >a lot of acquisitions by issuing new stock, and this might
account
> >for the larger than average float. However, the large debt would
> >argue against this since they have been profitable for the past
> >three years.
> >
> So how does it qualify as a CANSLIM stock? Sounds like the low
insider
> holding and high debt would disqualify it and help explain the
poor volume
> on the breakout?
> 
> Tim Fisher
> tfish@spiritone.com
> 1995 President - Pacific Fishery Biologists
> Keeper of the ORE-ROCK-ON Rockhounding in Oregon Home Page
> http://www.spiritone.com/~tfish
>

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.