From: "Doug Shannon" <dshannon@austin.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Direction of M
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 14:21:28 -0400
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] e trade Kent Norman
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M "David Squires"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M david
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I am referring to CANSLIM leaders (stocks that have good ratings, have broken out, and are leading the market higher). The Dow 30 is just an index of 30 blue chip stocks. This would not in and of itself make them leaders. Doug - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Robert Gaston Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:59 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Direction of M Doug - what would be a good list of leaders to follow? The DOW 30 or ...? Robert -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Doug Shannon Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:01 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Direction of M One should not immediately jump out the market after 4-5 distribution days. This is only a major warning sign that tells you to immediately start watching for a break down in the leaders. If you see leading stocks starting to break down and 4-5 distribution days (preferably on at least avg. volume) within a 2-3 week period then it is time to start dumping your stocks as they initiate sell rules. Doug - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of asosis@ca.ibm.com Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:51 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M I have asked this question before and I recall Tim posting that after 4-5 days one should be out of the market. Anna "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>@lists.xmission.com on 06/06/2001 12:41:08 PM Please respond to canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent by: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> cc: Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M Hi Ian, I am not the best expert on distribution days, but I believe I recall a member posting recently on an article from IBD, or maybe from Ask Bill O'Neil, and it indicated that he was not concerned about distribution days until there were more of them. Maybe someone still has the ref and can repost it? Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M Tom: My recent thinking has been along the lines you described below. However, if we close down today on increasing volume from yesterday (on the NASDAQ, volume is already a very healthy 900,000,000 and its only 9:00 am on the west coast)., then we will have had the 4th profressional distribution day in a short timeframe (May 22, 29, 30 were the other 3). How many does it take to make WON cautious? Thanks, Ian Of course, if the market reverses today and it closes up on another big volume surge - I will think that is very bullish :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:51 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M Hi Steve, I didn't see the IBD article, but had already noticed the c&h formed by the DOW 30, NYSE Composite, S&P 500, and Russell 2000. All formed the handle well in the upper half of the cup, and built a 2+ week tight handle. In the case of the first three, the recent two week correction brought them right back to the handle, and it provided support, a healthy sign. In the case of the R2000, it never reached the handle. In the case of the NASDAQ 100 and NASDAQ Composite, they also formed a c&h, however the handle formed in the lower half of the cup. Both were close to the 50% level, but not quite there, with the Naz Comp closer. Their handle was not as tight, and the recent correction brought them more towards the lower side of the handle. Treatment of bad news is much more positive today than just a month ago. XLNX (a chip maker), for example, is being credited with inspiring yesterday's big rally in the Naz. What they said is that order cancellations have slowed. Stated another way, that means that as bad as it already is, it is getting worse at a slower rate. Not only did the stock add nearly 10%, it rallied the market. A month ago, it would have taken a statement that order cancellations have stopped, or that order cancellations were being completely offset by new orders, to have achieved this. I review earnings warnings daily, and I see a steady sign that warnings that a company will miss either/both earnings or revenues is more often being received as a positive and a price gain. I also note that where the shortfall is quantified, in most cases it is only slightly below current forecasts, where before most were large drops. To me this signals that the investment community believes (or wants to believe) that the worst is over, the 2nd quarter won't be very pretty, but by the 4th qtr everything will be looking pretty good. From an economics standpoint, I am generally pleased with what I see. I still expect a rate cut at the June FOMC meeting, and there is probably a 50/50 chance of another 50 BP. I still think 25 BP makes more sense, tho. We appear to be into the usual summer doldrums now. Volume is down, and likely to remain that way until after Labor Day. So events (earnings, economics, etc) could cause greater volatility. But aside from that, I see a lot less volatility in the market. I also note that the IPO market is coming to life. I am seeing as many deals, if not more, being completed as are being withdrawn. And quite a few of the ones done opened with a nice premium. Bottom line, "M" is ultimately determined by investor sentiment, and right now that sentiment is quite positive despite what the media sometimes chooses to report. Tom Worley stkguru@netside.net AIM: TexWorley ----- Original Message ----- From: SKutney@aol.com To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:09 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Direction of M I was wondering what others thought of the general directions of the market? IBD recently made a big deal about the "cup with handle" pattern of the major indexes. I don't get the feel from reading the paper that they think the market is going down. They expect the 7% stop to just get you out. I take that paper each day and draw in red trend lines to remind me of the general direction of the market. I see three major indexes plus the mutual fund index breaking past the current trend line on real low volume. I always thought that the stock market is like trying to keep a ball up in the air with a water hose. The greater the volume the more is will go up. I see stocks like CPN and SHFL which have been strong leaders breaking down. I see other stocks ready to break into new highs. Steve - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] e trade Kent Norman
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M "David Squires"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Direction of M david
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]