Re: [CANSLIM] AMGN

From: "S Menon" <menonz@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] AMGN
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:07:59 PST

Next Article (by Author): Re: not [CANSLIM] Performance of Investment Newsletters Tim Fisher
Previous Article (by Author): not [CANSLIM] Performance of Investment Newsletters Johan Van Houtven
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Re: 8 minutes stock research.

I think I missed Db's post on this. Could someone forward it to me 
please ?

>From owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com Tue Nov 10 16:00:39 1998
>Received: from [198.60.22.7] by hotmail.com (1.0) with SMTP id 
MHotMail30881952371135065324973325826567330580; Tue Nov 10 16:00:39 1998
>Received: from domo by lists.xmission.com with local (Exim 2.04 #1)
>	id 0zdNhG-0005g1-00
>	for canslim-goout@lists.xmission.com; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:59:42 -0700
>Received: from [198.60.22.22] (helo=mail.xmission.com)
>	by lists.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #1)
>	id 0zdNhB-0005fQ-00
>	for canslim@lists.xmission.com; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:59:37 -0700
>Received: from [204.127.131.36] (helo=mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net)
>	by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #1)
>	id 0zdNh9-0006eb-00
>	for canslim@xmission.com; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:59:35 -0700
>Received: from charlesc ([12.77.203.202]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
>          (InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with SMTP
>          id <19981110235854.PFTH3718@charlesc> for 
<canslim@xmission.com>;
>          Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:58:54 +0000
>From: "Charles Cangialosi" <chcng@worldnet.att.net>
>To: "canslim" <canslim@xmission.com>
>Subject: [CANSLIM] AMGN
>Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 19:01:25 -0500
>Message-ID: <000201be0d06$6c500160$7004460c@charlesc>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>	charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
>Importance: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
>Sender: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>X-No-Archive: yes
>
>
>Db sent a message earlier this week on how to research a stock in 8 
minutes.
>Im not quite up to the 8 minute level yet. However I did find something 
that
>is curious. IBD has AMGN as 87 96 AAA this looks good. The sector is 
not as
>good as Tech and Internet but nothing is at the present. Still the 
sector is
>good. I have internet and semi so I want to do a little in this sector. 
On
>checking the earnings I dont think the increases are all that great. 
Goldman
>Sacks downgraded the stock. I would say the buy point on this would 
have
>been 78 in recent history. Its at a new high at 82 which is about 5%
>extended (according to my calculations). I am going to pass on it. It 
looked
>good at first and probably is. My understanding of earnings is they 
should
>be 15%+ over prior qtr, How does this stock get such high RS and EPS
>ratings. I would assume that WON is correct and I am not. Where am I 
going
>wrong.
>
>Charlie
>
>
>-
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

- -

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.