Stability Issues in DCG
All of us know something about gelatin and the way it ages
and holds up in various environments. It is present in many foods we
eat and in leather and furs we wear. It is a fibrous felt like substance
made up of dozens of amino acids arranged in long polypeptide chains. In
leather it has been tanned for strength and lubricated to better stand the
flexing. In photographic films it has also been tanned or cross linked to
resist abrasion and absorption of water which would cause it to swell and
become very soft and perhaps a meal for micro-organisms. In holographic
phase only films the degree of hardness plays a key role in determining
the clearness of the gel after it has undergone rapid dehydration. We
begin to harden it first by cooking it for several hours with water
vapor present, then by continued dark reaction with chromate ions, then
by exposure to actinic or blue radiation to harden a pattern into it,
then through a low ph bath of water and salts such as Kodak fixer with
hardener and finally with a post process dry bake out at temperatures
up to 120 deg C . This last treatment will increase the density of
the film and decrease the legendary affinity it has for water vapor,
but it is still far from water proof.
2. Hologram formation in gelatin
A DCG hologram is first formed optically by absorbing light and cross
linking at the sites where the light is most intense. Then the whole
film is swollen in water with the most heavily exposed regions swelling a
little less than the unexposed or lightly exposed regions. At this point
we have a dimensional magnification of the original fringe pattern where
the water has decreased the density of the gel periodically corresponding
to the original interference pattern. If it were possible to dry the film
at this point without having it change dimensions then there would be
a very large difference in the densities of light and dark areas which
translates into a large change in permittivity or index of refraction
at optical wavelengths. Unfortunately the surface tension of the water
causes the structure to collapse to a small index change if left to
dry at standard pressure and any temperature. People involved in making
aerogels come up against this problem constantly and must resort to the
use of pressure chambers, miscible solvents and other tricks to dry out
their gels without shrinkage. We have found empirically that a mixture
of water and alcohol with a specific gravity of .86 will remove much of
the water without collapsing the structure by replacing some of it with
alcohol. When the specific gravity is adjusted to about .84 then the
structure begins to shrink and the gelatin begins to become more rigid.
When we get to .76 to .78 the whole structure is rigid and the manner
in which this is done determines the final index modulation of the film
and some other properties. Normally the film is soaked with agitation
in the .86 bath for a minute or more and then plunged into a much drier
bath followed by an even drier and perhaps hotter bath from which it is
slowly drawn as a finished piece. Alternatively several more baths may
be used to gradually get to the driest possible bath and temperatures
should be in the 50 to 70 degree C range for highly modulated broadband
films or at room temp or lower for uniformly small modulations. The
higher temperatures enable more rapid diffusion of the alcohol into
the gel where it can more rapidly dilute, displace and expel the water
leaving substantially higher differences between light and dark fringes.
3. Heat, Cold and Moisture
Nothing short of laminating the film between two pieces of glass,
with a 3 to 6 mm border of
gelatin removed from the substrate, will prevent the gel from eventually
absorbing enough moisture, when stored at high humidity or near dew
point conditions, to cause a total collapse of the holographic fringe
pattern. All permanent DCG holograms made since the late sixties have
faded to oblivion unless they were stored continually below 90% RH or
have been capped with glass. A few thick and dense plastics have also
been successful but most coatings and plastic laminates merely act like
sponges and then like osmotic pumps carrying water molecules through
their surfaces and into the gelatin, which readily accepts it. We always
bake our gratings and hoes prior to capping with warm glass, to further
insure that the water content trapped in the lamination is small enough to
never become a threat to the fragile fringe structure. Trapped moisture
that does no harm at room temperature will upon heating become active
enough to wet and soften the delicate expanded structure that makes up the
diffracting fringes, which will then collapse and join together in a more
homogeneous layer, exhibiting only very weak diffraction. The baking is
absolutely necessary for stability in extreme environments. We have tested
many holographic scanners and outdoor hoes to destruction by baking after
capping until the glue holding the parts together decomposes and turns
dark. The gelatin and the recorded fringes usually survive up to 230
deg C where they begin to darken and carbonize. Some of this darkening
can be attributed to the release of chromium from bonds in the gelatin
and its subsequent reduction, along with some chrome salts that were
never completely rinsed out during processing. Longer soak times in ever
cleaner water baths will remove most of the residual chrome compounds and
greatly reduce yellowing by heat and also by UV radiation. The gel does
not seem to be affected by low temperatures and the adhesion to glass
is good throughout all temperature ranges, provided that the glass was
clean and final washed just prior to coating.
4. Radiation effects
The effect of high energy radiation on gelatin is also important to
anyone intending to put DCG hoes into space or into solar collectors
outdoors or into creative lighting designs in buildings where the
windows are DCG gratings. Gelatin, like all organic and many inorganic
substances will be damaged by photons of more than 4 or 5 electron volts.
Eventually all the bonds will be broken if the flux and energy are high
enough for long enough. The gel will then be decomposed into loose
atoms and molecules incapable of maintaining the original physical
form. Fortunately the process takes a very long time to complete,
if the gel is protected between two pieces of glass. We have tested
holographic scanners sandwiched between two pieces of 1.5 mm thick glass
by placing them near a 250 watt low pressure mercury arc lamp for over
24 hours or until the glass itself solarized and became dark near the
exposed surface. The gelatin was unchanged in diffractive properties
but the glue line and the gel were slightly yellowed which would reduce
transmission in the blue region. Less severe tests on display holograms
were carried out from 1977 to 1979 where the test pieces were placed out
in the open to take on whatever the weather in Salt Lake city and also in
New Jersey could dish out. In all cases, for a year or for a month, the
glue that we were using then became noticeably yellow but the gelatin and
glass remained unchanged within the limits of our ability to measure it
optically. Another test was carried out on DCG and three other recording
materials that were all prepared in our Paradise lab in 1989 for Northrop
electronics division. Several Sample gratings were recorded on thick
fused silica substrates and then baked and capped with another silica
plate. This time the wave-fronts were measured and photographed before
and after the radiation treatments. Neither the efficiency or any other
property of the hologram changed from high energy radiation equivalent
to several years of direct exposure in space. Somewhere a formal report
exists to back up this statement but it did not yield to my searches and
the individuals that carried out the work are no longer at Northrop.
They did send me some photographs of the wave-fronts and I have those
but they cannot tell me what the radiation doses were. In this case the
silica could not absorb much of the radiation so it was a truer test of
the durability of the gelatin itself. A few of our customers have put
our large gratings into green houses as panes of glass and they appear
to have survived at least since 1986 or so. Several 16 inch diameter
hoes have gone to NASA Goddard where they are used in outdoor LIDAR
since about 1991. One early reflection hoe which was not baked out has
drifted a little to the blue, nothing that was baked thoroughly before
sealing has changed.
5. Summary
Our experience with holograms and hoes recorded in DCG since 1974 has
been varied and more or less all encompassing with respect to the variety
of product and applications possible with this material. We can speak
with some authority to the issue of stability and durability in hostile
environments. We have made thousands of hoes that have endured 10 or
more years of industrial or commercial environments without failing,
as long as they were sealed between two pieces of glass at least one
half mm thick with at least 3 mm of cleared area near the outer rim of
the sandwich. We have also had a lot of failed product that was sent
out without that total protection. The O ring type seal formed by the
glass to glue to glass bond in the cleared region is absolutely a must
for longevity as is the final bake-out before capping. To neglect the O
ring will most likely result in a faded recording over time, if ample
water vapor is also present. At a minimum the edges of the recording
will disappear for several mm into the sandwich. Capillarity pulls the
water ever farther into the plates until most or all of the gelatin
softens and collapses. Radiation does not seem to be any more hazardous
to gelatin than it is to glass and it holds up better than any plastic
we have embossed into. Most of the horror stories of disappearing hoes
or blue shifting hoes or the loss of some initial efficiency have their
origin in less than optimum preparation before capping. We think we know
how to do it right and now so do you.
RDR
Last modified on 2/18/99
Back to home page